There’s a quiet myth about AI at work: that it’s only useful if it gets everything right.
The truth is, nothing in business ever gets everything right the first time—not a proposal draft, not ad creative, not even meeting notes. Why hold AI to a higher standard than we hold ourselves?
That’s where the “Good Enough” rule comes in. Instead of expecting AI to make the final call, treat it like a capable assistant who can get you most of the way there—quickly. You decide what’s worth keeping, what needs refinement, and when it’s time to hit send.
This mindset changes everything. It turns AI from a one-time experiment into a reliable productivity habit. It’s about progress, not perfection—and learning to trust AI just enough to let it help.
There’s a lot of hype around AI, from “just prompt it and you’re done,” to “AI will replace you.” But the truth in everyday workflows is more modest and far more useful. Many tasks in a business context are repetitive, structured, and somewhat generic—and that’s where AI shines.
However, tasks where you’re making final decisions, dealing with nuance, risk, reputation or customer relationships—those are areas where a human should still remain firmly in the loop.
By adopting the “Good Enough” rule you:
If you hand off full decision control to AI, you risk automation bias—the tendency for humans to over-trust automated systems and accept their outputs without sufficient critical review. Research on human-AI trust shows that trust, usefulness, and quality of AI outputs all contribute to whether people adopt AI systems.
“The intention to adopt AI as delegated agents is influenced by social, cognitive, and affective trust.” (ScienceDirect)
In short: you’ll use AI more if you trust it, if it’s obviously helpful, and if you feel it’s under your control. Using AI as a “starting tool” rather than a “final decision tool” aligns with this research—it preserves your agency while extracting value.
If you set the bar at “AI must replace the entirety of this job,” you’ll likely either never adopt it, or adopt it once and drop it when it fails. But if you think of it as “AI drafts, I refine,” then you’re more likely to build a habit. That habit is what leads to consistent usage—and that is what drives benefit in business workflows.
Here’s a structured way to adopt this mindset across tasks:
Look for tasks that are repetitive, structured, or have clear templates and that don’t require 100% human judgment. Examples:
These are tasks where you can tolerate editing and refining.
Once you pick a task:
Here is your moment to step in:
Ask yourself: “Is it saving me time? Does the draft cover the core idea? Can I improve it with some editing?”—then yes, it was good enough to be useful.
After finishing the task, ask:
Over time, your prompts improve, your confidence increases, and using AI becomes part of your workflow, not a one-off experiment.
It helps to know what you should not immediately hand over fully to AI without testing and a human in the loop:
By keeping human judgment in the loop for these tasks, you protect both quality and trust in the AI-assisted process.
Don't wait. Try this: pick one task this week—maybe your next email, blog outline, or meeting summary. Then go find an AI agent to help you with it. Spend a few minutes reviewing and refining it if needed, then ask yourself:
If yes, you just applied the “Good Enough” rule. If no, ask: what could I tweak next time to get a better starting point?
Small wins lead to consistent usage—and consistent usage is what turns AI from a shiny experiment into a reliable part of how you work.